Yearly Archives: 2010

Renaisi short-listed as best social enterprise at the 2010 London Business Awards

Renaisi was short-listed as a finalist in 2 categories at the 2010 London Business Awards, sponsored by HSBC last week.

The London Business Awards are organised by Archant London, which is the UK’s largest independently-owned media business. They awards are intended to recognise and showcase significant achievements of London businesses in a number of categories including innovation, community involvement, social enterprise etc. The panel of judges included HSBC, UEL/Knowledge Dock; Business in the Community (BITC); Mercedes-Benz London; the East London Small Business Centre and the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham. Hundreds of people gathered for the event at the Planit Embankment Gardens with a keynote speech from Anthony Browne, the policy director for economic development for London Mayor, Boris Johnson.

Although we are disappointed to not have scooped the top prize, we are still delighted to have been recognised as a finalist in both the ‘Best Social Enterprise’ category and the ‘Best London Regeneration Project’ (for the EC1 New Deal Public Space Strategy), especially seeing as there were a record number of entries. Bikeworks won the ‘Best Social Enterprise’ category and Skip Garden won the ‘Best London Regeneration Project’. This builds on our recent award for best Hackney Social Enterprise at the Hackney Business Awards 20120.

Renaisi part of consortium selected to lead development of Big Local Trust programme

Renaisi is one of six partners in a consortium that has been selected to develop Big Lottery Fund’s groundbreaking, £200m, Big Local Trust programme.

The consortium, which is led by Community Development Foundation (CDF) and also includes CCLA, IVAR, NANM and UnLtd, has been awarded a grant of £80k, to develop the business plan for the creation of a new Trust in the summer of 2011. Partners will recommend Directors for the new Trust based on their experience of working with disadvantaged communities. The Trust will then deliver a programme over 10 years in up to 150 deprived neighbourhoods in England. The funding will support schemes that help meet local needs and build skills and confidence in those communities.

Clive Tritton, Chief Executive of Renaisi said:

“We are absolutely delighted to be part of the consortium selected to develop the Big Local Trust. Renaisi’s mission is to create sustainable, attractive and inclusive neighbourhoods, which foster the talent and diversity of local people. We firmly believe that you can only reverse the fortunes of deprived neighbourhoods if you commit to a long-term process of change – one which recognises and builds the capacity of local communities to support themselves. This is at the heart of the Big Local Trust and we look forward to working with our partners to deliver a positive legacy of change over the next 10 years”

For further information please contact: Donna Lightbown, Head of Policy and Communications, 0207 033 2614, d.lightbown@renaisi.com

Notes to editors:

The other consortium partners are:

The Community Development Foundation (CDF) is the lead partner in the consortium. Managing programmes that fund projects in our communities, CDF carries out research into what works, and uses that to improve policy and practice. We are the leader in community development strategy and delivery. CDF works with more than 100 national and local VCS organisations and over 20,000 local community groups managing a total of £250m worth of government programmes over the last five years. CDF has a unique partnership with both government and those making change on the ground. CDF strengthens local voices, helps shape communities and changes lives.

CDF is a charity registered in England and Wales. Until 31st March 2011, CDF is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG). Find out more at www.cdf.org.uk

CCLA provides specialist investment management for charities, faith organisations, and local authorities. They deliver sustainable and growing income – fixed interest, balanced investment, global equity income, ethical investment and property. They offer cash management services, and a free asset allocation advice service to support trustees, investment committees and officers in their decision-making. They invest money for more charities than any other fund manager in the UK (Charity finance magazine) and do not offer services to private individuals. CCLA Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

The Institute for Voluntary Action Research (IVAR) helps VCS organisations of all sizes mobilise their own resources and manage their own situations. Established in 2006, IVAR gathers, refines and shares knowledge of what works with practitioners, policy makers, funders and researchers. IVAR use action research methods in their work, publish articles and reports and run events to help share findings. The work has a dual purpose: improving practice and contributing to shaping the national and local policy environment for voluntary sector organisations.

The National Association of Neighbourhood Management (NANM) run a national learning network for those involved in neighbourhood projects and promote neighbourhood-level decision-making. The NANM (established in 2008) was formerly known as the National Neighbourhood Management Network. The network was set up in 2002 by Communities and Local Government (previously the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) to support neighbourhood partnerships which are ‘narrowing the gap’ by improving the quality of life in communities across England. Since then it has grown to represent more than 350 partnerships across the country. The NANM is the place to meet and learn from others who are engaged in regenerating their communities, find out the latest in policy and practice and benefit from the range of support that the association has to offer.

UnLtd find, assess, fund and support strongly motivated people who are resourceful and resilient, building their confidence and skills to achieve local impact through sustainable social ventures of all kinds – from voluntary groups through social enterprise to social businesses. UnLtd have already backed nearly 10,000 people to make their vision of social environmental benefit become a reality. Their role is to find, fund and support individuals developing early stage social ventures directly, by co-running or via local intermediaries. Cliff Prior, the Chief Executive, has experience of running the Millennium Awards Trust, which has now doubled its annual impact through raising external funds.

The Big Lottery Fund’s £200 million Big Local Trust programme was launched in July 2010 to establish an independent trust to support local funding schemes in 100 to 150 urban and rural neighbourhoods in England. The targeted neighbourhoods are places where many people face multiple barriers to meeting their needs, and which have not had great success in gaining resources to help. Each neighbourhood will receive between £1m and £2m, and will have up to 10 years to allocate this money. CDF has been selected as the preferred applicant to set up and run the Trust and awarded a grant of up to £80,000 to develop a business plan. If the business plan is approved, CDF will then be formally appointed to run the Trust in summer 2011.

The Big Lottery Fund, the largest of the National Lottery good cause distributors, has been rolling out grants to health, education, environment and charitable causes across the UK since its inception in June 2004. It was established by Parliament on 1 December 2006.

Big Lottery Fund Press Office: 020 7211 1888 Out of hours: 07867 500 572
Public enquiries line: 08454 102030 Textphone: 08456 021 659

Full details of the work of the Big Lottery Fund, its programmes and awards are available on the website: www.biglotteryfund.org.uk

Out of Hours contact Details:
Big Lottery Fund: 07867 500 572
CDF: 0770 9323 690

Renaisi launches first report in a new research series looking at the impact of the economic downturn on London

Renaisi has launched the first report in a new series of research reports looking at the impact of the economic downturn on London. The research series aims to build up a detailed picture of the downturn’s economic, social and physical impact on London’s neighbourhoods, and to support local government and other agencies to respond effectively to changes taking place in their area.

The first report maps and analyses the JSA claimant count across all boroughs in the capital since April 2008 through to the start of the new governments (both local and national) in May 2010. By describing the geography of claimants as well as the volume, the report highlights the concerns and issues for each of London’s boroughs and neighbourhoods. The first report aims to address the following questions:

1. What is the pattern of change in the claimant count across London?
2. Which boroughs and which neighbourhoods are experiencing the biggest increases, the biggest proportional change, and which have the largest counts?
3. Is the impact of the claimant count increases being felt more in particular neighbourhoods? How equal is the spatial distribution of the claimant count across London?

Key findings can be summarised as:

• There is a clear trend that as the overall number of claimants in a borough increases, the inequality between the neighbourhoods of that borough decreases. The recession has, therefore, not furthered the spatial inequality of unemployment across the capital.

• In terms of the absolute volume of claimants, Lambeth is the borough with the largest number of claimants (11,517). In May 2010, Tower Hamlets and Newham had, respectively, the second and third most claimants. This needs to be considered alongside the large populations of these boroughs, but it does underline the scale of claimants in some large London boroughs. Kingston and Richmond have the lowest number of claimants, with less than 2,200 per borough.

• The neighbourhoods that have seen the biggest increase of claimants during the recession are three along the Paddington Basin (two in south Brent and one in north Westminster), but also Slade Green in the far east of London in Bexley.

• The biggest percentage increases in claimants have been experienced in the outer London boroughs of Havering, Hillingdon, Sutton and Kingston. All have seen at least a doubling of their claimant count since April 2008. Whilst this may have started from a low base, it shows a very large change in context for those boroughs, and therefore categorises the challenge in these boroughs as being one of a changing scale of the issue, rather than the absolute number of claimants.

• Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea have extremely high inequality levels between the neighbourhoods of the boroughs – to a much greater extent that the London wide trend.

• Merton, Croydon and Enfield all have higher neighbourhood inequalities than the London trend and their claimant counts would suggest.

• Kingston upon Thames, Hounslow and Newham all have lower neighbourhood inequalities than the London trend and their claimant counts would suggest.

The research was undertaken and produced by Renaisi Consultants, John Hitchin and Nicola Clarke.

The research reports will be published regularly and will be available to download on the Renaisi website. Please click here to download the report and click here to access the borough data. If you would like more information please contact:

Senior Consultant, Research and Policy John Hitchin
E. j.hitchin@renaisi.com
T. 020 7033 2639

Head of Policy and Communications Donna Lightbown
E. d.lightbown@renaisi.com
T. 020 7033 2614

All maps and spatial analysis was produced by Renaisi’s in-house GIS team. For more information on our GIS services and how to present data in a spatial format, please contact Nicola Clark on n.clark@renaisi.com

Renaisi scoops Best Social Enterprise award

Renaisi was awarded the title of Best Social Enterprise last night, at the Mayor of Hackney’s Business Awards 2010.  The award, which was sponsored by the Co-operative Bank, was granted to Renaisi in recognition of  ’its excellence as a social business and commitment to providing clear benefits to the community, embedded social and environmental aims, and tangible evidence of success’.

Renaisi Chief Executive Clive Tritton said: “We are delighted to receive this award.  As a local business we are passionate about Hackney and are most proud of the successes we’ve achieved locally.  This includes our delivery of Hackney Works a programme that aims to tackle unemployment and child poverty in the borough, and Invest in Hackney which has helped attract and retain over 2000 SMEs and entrepreneurs over the past decade.

“It really feels like we’ve come full circle.  Last year we won the national ‘Regeneration Consultancy of the Year’ award for our work around encouraging enterprise, tackling worklessness, neighbourhood regeneration and empowering communities.  These were all services that we started off delivering in Hackney in 1998 when Hackney Council was our one and only client – and so we believe that our reputation as a leading regeneration consultancy and the expansion of our business over the past decade is largely down to the success we’ve achieved locally in Hackney”.

Big love for EC1

A giant, 3D “EC1” inspired hundreds of residents to let their creative skills loose at this weekend’s Whitecross Street Party. The larger-than-life lettering formed a canvas for attendees of all ages to leave their artistic mark as well as write messages about why EC1 is a special place to live. Julie Lovell, aged 32, who lives on Old Street wrote:

“EC1 is special because I can find everything I need within 100metres of my flat. I love the history of the area and its vibrant, creative spirit.”

Eleven-year-old Ephraim Isloa who lives on Errol Street wrote: “EC1 is special because there is a variety of great opportunities and fantastic education for children like me. EC1 is unique, with many great fun things to do for all ages.” The concept was created by EC1 New Deal for Communities, the ten-year £52 million regeneration programme which began in 2001 and is managed by Renaisi. Chief Executive Kirby Swales said: “People had really positive things to say – there was a great feeling of pride for the area. Many commented on how safe and clean it is here and that the parks look good. We also had a lot of comments about the strong sense of community, which is vital for any neighbourhood to prosper.” Over 120 individual messages describing why EC1 is a special place were pinned to the 3D model over the two-day event. It proved so popular, plans are in place to tour it to locations within the area over the coming months. London street

Our approach to successful neighbourhood regeneration

Understanding the key economic roles and social uses of town centres; designing and delivering comprehensive employment programmes to tackle worklessness and supporting the Third Sector to play a greater role in providing public services….Renaisi has recently published a suite of new promotional flyers which set out our approach to successful neighbourhood regeneration.  Click on the icons below or contact us for more information.  We will be adding to these in coming weeks so visit again.

  

Community Assets
> View pdf
  Green Neighbourhoods > View pdf   Neighbourhoods Matter > View pdf   Routes to Employment> View pdf Town Centres
> View pdf
 
     
             

What next for Regeneration?

By Russell Spencer

 “What Next for Regeneration?” is a key question that is on the lips of all those with an interest in the sector. The approaching election, public spending cuts and general economic uncertainty have bought this question to the fore, and delegates at Renaisi’s Annual Lecture were looking to our speakers for answers.

Caroline Spelman, the Shadow Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, was understandably in full election mode: giving her speech a few days after the launch of the long-awaited Conservative Planning Paper, Spellman spelled out the benefits the Tories’ changes would bring for regeneration. More money would be available for local authorities that encouraged business and housing development; regional level bureaucracy would be abolished and a presumption in favour of sustainable development. Under the plans the Community Infrastructure Levy would also be abolished.

Vince Cable’s then took the rostrum and promptly admitted he didn’t have any expertise in regeneration. Not the most auspicious start you might think, but Vince went on to talk convincingly about the state of the economy and what it might mean for financing regeneration in the future; together with the gloomy outlook for property-led development there was also optimism about the new models of regeneration that could emerge out of the chaos, and Vince expressed a strong desire to give local authorities more power and control over revenue generation which could be ploughed back into their areas.

This was something taken up by Sir Albert Bore, the former leader of Birmingham City Council who has overseen an impressive transformation of the physical fabric Birmingham Town Centre. Bore trumpeted the achievements of renowned 19th-century Birmingham mayor Joseph Chamberlain and his fellow municipal socialists in transforming their areas and boasted of the steps New Labour had taken to give a greater degree of control to local authorities. He also praised the former mayor of Barcelona, Pasqual Mira, who oversaw the Olympic-led transformation of his city in the early 1990s. According to Bore, Mira stressed two important things needed for successful regeneration – vision and leadership. He didn’t add, however, that these are only effective if they are backed up with real power at the local level.

Questions from the audience were many and varied. Renaisi’s own Adam Barnett kicked off the questioning by asking what should be the underlying principles for urban regeneration, to which most of the panel answered ‘sustainability’ – although without discussing what this actually means or should mean. Another audience member took the speakers to task for failing to mention the importance of tackling inequality – something that shocked Ms Spelman who was adamant the spirit of this could be discerned in her party’s planning measures. Other topics raised included the importance of developing new models to capture private sector financing and the role of families in urban regeneration schemes.

Overall the debate was lively, the speeches thought-provoking, the wine plentiful and the food abundant. As ever with these things, answering one question seems to throw up several more. Subjects for future Renaisi lectures, perhaps…

Thoughts from the Future of Regeneration debate (pt 3)

Rod Stewart and public service reform

By John Hitchin, Senior Consultant, Renaisi

This is one of three short blogs that were written after sitting at the back of a recent Chatham House rule debate on the ‘Future of Regeneration’, hosted by Renaisi.  There were a range of participants from academia, consultancy, the public sector and the social enterprise sector.  The pieces are inspired by the debate itself, but also Philippe Starck, Albert Einstein and Rod Stewart.  It is difficult to talk about a session that was under the Chatham House rule without either breaking that rule, or looking like you’re stealing the ideas of other people without having to reference them.  To be responsible about this, let us assume that any points of interest in these pieces come from the participants, and the dull bits in between are mine! (For more information about the debate itself, listen to these thoughts from Renaisi Chief Executive, Kevin Sugrue.)



‘I wish, that, I knew what I know now, when I was younger’.
Sound like Rod Stewart to you?  Well it was actually written by Ronnie Lane and Ronnie Wood of The Faces.  Ronnie Wood, now of the Rolling Stones, sang vocals, not Rod Stewart.  Although the version you’re thinking of is probably the 1998 Rod Stewart cover.  That piece of useless information might be useful to you in a pub quiz one day.



To finish off my three notes on the debate, I’ve started with another quote.  This was provoked by one of the participants stating that ‘if we knew ten years ago what we know now, we could have done it all with half the money’.   That got your attention didn’t it?  The amount (half the money) was obviously more rhetoric than a calculated case, but the point remains whether it was 40%, 50% or 60%.



This statement was not so much a shock, we all know that hindsight is a wonderful thing, but it did highlight three points to me.  The first is that a lot has been done in the last ten years.  Through investment in public services and a growing awareness of the powerful role of the voluntary and third sectors, much has been achieved in regenerating our communities, and everybody in the sector can talk of strong success stories.  In doing this, a lot has been learnt.



Secondly, do we do enough to make sure we don’t forget the lessons of previous approaches?  The New Deal for Communities programme, for example, is one of the most evaluated pieces of public policy, and yet it seems to be quietly slipping off any agenda.  I know, from experience, that there is plenty to learn from this massive investment in 39 of our most deprived neighbourhoods, but you try finding the NDCs on the CLG website.  The evaluation reports are there, but they are not easy to find.  Nobody is suggesting that we could (or even should) have another round of NDCs, but there is obviously an enormous amount to learn from them.  In terms of an agenda, this is the remit of the HCA Academy (soon to be taken in-house) but a lack of institutional memory has occurred before and will probably occur again.  We perhaps need to rethink how we retain knowledge within the communities themselves and not the ‘sector’.  The communities are always there; individuals and governance structures move on.



Thirdly, money isn’t enough. The last ten years have seen a massive re-investment in many communities, but it also feels like money can blunt your thinking.  Sorry for the cliché, but necessity is often the mother of invention, and relying on state money across the board has perhaps been pushed as far is it can in some of our communities.  I am not advocating for a lack of investment where it’s needed, but I am hoping that less resource means smarter delivery, and an acceptance that money driven agendas can sometimes cloud our minds to what we originally wanted to do (see Kevin Harris’ article on empowerment that illustrates these issues from one perspective)



What Ronnie (and Rod) didn’t mention is that learning something is not a binary thing.  You don’t not know it, and then suddenly become aware.  It’s a process we need to go through, and we can’t ‘know’ it when we are younger.  We’ve got to live it and learn it together.

Thoughts from the Future of Regeneration debate (pt 2)

Albert Einstein and my neighbours

Thoughts from the Future of Regeneration debate (pt 1)

Philippe Starck and regeneration

By John Hitchin, Senior Consultant, Renaisi

This is one of three short blogs that were written after sitting at the back of a recent Chatham House rule debate on the ‘Future of Regeneration’, hosted by Renaisi. There were a range of participants from academia, consultancy, the public sector and the social enterprise sector. The pieces are inspired by the debate itself, but also Philippe Starck, Albert Einstein and Rod Stewart.

It is difficult to talk about a session that was under the Chatham House rule without either breaking that rule, or looking like you’re stealing the ideas of other people without having to reference them. To be responsible about this, let us assume that any points of interest in these pieces come from the participants, and the dull bits in between are mine! (For more information about the debate itself, listen to these thoughts from Renaisi Chief Executive, Kevin Sugrue.)

Early on in the discussion, one of the participants quoted the designer Philippe Starck when talking about the mess of structures and institutions that make up the regeneration landscape in East London, and which at times seem designed to stop things getting done. ‘You’ve got to keep the violence of the original idea’.

It was that quote that got me thinking: what is our original idea now? The regeneration industry has become a more mature one over the thirty years since Michael Heseltine’s infamous White Paper, but in maturing it also has a tendency to forget what it wanted in the first place. I watched Revolutionary Road on the same night, and kept thinking about how we can all lose track of the violent ideas, passions and hopes of our youth. That’s not always a bad thing; sometimes we need to mature, smooth off our edges and learn from experience, but it’s a terrible thing if that comes at the cost of what we wanted in the first place.

Regeneration has had a couple of ‘original ideas’. The first came from Heseltine, another was driven by the incoming Labour government in 1997 with the twin projects of Neighbourhood Renewal and Urban Renaissance. (The regeneration framework of 2008/09, whilst having a promising definition of regeneration can hardly be described as a document that got the heart racing!)

Whatever the outcome of the forthcoming election, a new idea is needed: something that shapes and drives what regeneration is, and also what it can achieve. What we absolutely do not want is something that builds depressingly on the existing model. Endlessly trying to re-jig what we have with a policy tweak here, a new initiative there, just isn’t going to cut it.

Many of us know this. Julian Dobson and New Start Magazine have been raising these very issues over the last few months, Kevin Harris has been talking about it for a long time, and the debate at Renaisi underlined just how frustrated many are with the situation at the moment.

The question is how to do it. I would like to propose that in undertaking this process those of us working in regeneration forget that it is a ‘sector’ or an ‘industry’ and focus on the communities we are supposed to support. This will probably mean that our next ‘original idea’ won’t come from the centre (with any luck).

Enabling change in our neighbourhoods

‘#regenfuture’ is the twitter tag for a new debate about what should go into a new manifesto for regeneration. Renaisi attended a first roundtable event  organized by New Start to kick it off. There were many interesting proposals. All participants agreed that regeneration needs to be made about much more the built  environment, and there should be a continuing focus on deprived areas.

 

People felt we should do more to recognize and nurture the enthusiasm and aspiration of local people – a new phrase’ community outlook’ was aired, which tries to explain why some communities are more resilient and cohesive than others. Other common points were to devolve more power/funding to city/regions and neighbourhoods, learn from continental Europe rather than the US, support mutual models of ownership and indigenous economic development, and change the relationship between state and citizen – with the state’s primary function is arguably to become primarily one of enabling change at the neighbourhood level.

 

Many of these arguments are well-rehearsed but also very high-level. There is a real need to now make them actionable (or outcome-focused in the jargon of the day), especially given the more austere times ahead. This is the next test to make this group a success, and we’ll keep you updated on as it progresses.

Renaisi 11th Lecture?

For everyone involved in trying to turn around the fortunes of deprived neighbourhoods these are interesting times. After many years of sustained economic growth and investment many neighbourhoods remain isolated and distressed. The upcoming general election provides an opportunity to influence national and local policy and learn the lessons from the past. However the impact of the recession will be felt for years to come with limited private investment in regeneration schemes coupled with unprecedented cuts in public expenditure and programmes. A whole new approach is needed.

We have assembled an impressive line up of speakers to debate these (and other!) questions, including Caroline Spelman MP, Vince Cable MP and Peter Holbrook from the Social Enterprise Coalition.

We believe that there are at least three core questions that need answering:-

1. Do we understand the problem regeneration is trying to solve – have we got the balance right between physical, social, economic and environmental interventions?
2. How should/could future regeneration be financed in the future?
3. What is the role of the public, private and third sector delivering leading and delivering regeneration?

What do you think? Join us to discuss and debate the issues with the panel of speakers but also with your colleagues. The debate has been organised in association with our media partners New Start magazine and will contribute to their Regeneration Manifesto.

Date:

24th February

Programme:
17:15 Canapés and Drinks
17:50 Welcome – Kevin Sugrue, Chief Executive, Renaisi Ltd
18:00 Speakers – including Vince Cable, Caroline Spelman and Sir Albert Bore
18:45 Question and Answer Session
19:15 Wine Reception and Networking

Map:
London street

One Bishops Square, Allen Overy Lecture Theatre, London, E1 6AD

RSVP: Renaisi, 21 Garden Walk, London EC2A 3EQ
E: d.lightbown@renaisi.com

Raising our Game, Hackney 2012

Renaisi has played a key role in the development of the London Borough of Hackney’s 2012 plans since 2004 when Renaisi first seconded a team of regeneration and economic development consultants to the Council. Led by then Renaisi Chief Executive, Kevin Sugrue, who was the interim Chief 2012 Officer in Hackney between 2005 – 2006, the team advised on and co-ordinated the borough’s involvement in London’s 2012 activity, until a permanent Olympic and Paralymic Unit was secured in 2007. This included advising on business and other relocations on behalf of all five 2012 host boroughs; preparing the borough’s 2012 Community Engagement Strategy; developing and co-ordinating the Volunteering Programme; co-ordinating school’s involvement and ensuring that the physical development of the Olympic Park provides the right kind of legacy benefit for local communities.

Renaisi was also involved in the planning for the 2012 games with Hackney and worked with Hackney’s Olympic and Paralympic Unit to co-ordinate Hackney’s involvement in three key 2012 Legacy plans, the Strategic Regeneration Framework, the Legacy Masterplan Framework and the Multi-Area Agreement.

The Learning Trust, Hackney’s Education Authority, also appointed Renaisi Renaisi to manage their 2012 project ‘Schools at the Heart’. The project aimed to engage all of Hackney’s young people in 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games activity through the schools’ curriculum, which included promoting international links, cultural understanding and the learning of new languages. The project also aimed to help increase young people’s participation in healthy physical activity and involvement in skills training and employment opportunities.

More recently, Renaisi Director of Strategy, Rob Pearce, has been working with Hackney Council to ensure it secures the best possible legacy use for the media facilities after the 2012 Games. This has involved Rob working directly with the Hackney Mayor, Cabinet Member for Regeneration and Head of the 2012 team to ensure the Council’s long held ambition to regenerate the commercial and industrial areas around Hackney Wick is realised. The masterplanning exercise for the wider Wick neighbourhood is being delivered by planning consultants EDAW on behalf of the 2 boroughs and the London Thames Gateway Development Company.

Renaisi is heavily involved in the planning for the 2012 games and has worked with Waltham Forest and Tower Hamlets on their 2012 Legacy Strategy.