Tag Archives: government

Tears for Blears?

The resignation of Hazel Blears from the government, and the subsequest appointment of John Denham at Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government has prompted much discussion in the Renaisi offices.

Read the reactions of three Renaisi consultants here:

Denham to patch up DCLG

No sooner has Hazel Blears cleared her desk than John Denham has taken over the mantle of Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

It will obviously take time for his presence to be felt. He takes charge at a time when many regeneration projects are being shelved and planners are being made redundant. Coming from the Department of Innovation, Skills and University he does at least know (or rather should know) the vital importance of connecting people with sustainable jobs and ensuring they have the right qualifications to take advantage of them. This is something that is vital in regenerating deprived places and central to Renaisi’s work.

It will be interesting how Mr Denham uses his experience in dealing with skills issues and applies them at the DCLG, starting with the £1bn Future Jobs Fund announced as part of the last budget, aimed at supporting the creation of jobs for long term unemployed young people and others who face significant disadvantage in the labour market. Its target is to create 150,000 jobs, although only 50,000 of these will be targeted at unemployment ‘hotspots’ and only 10,000 are expected to be ‘green jobs’.

Amongst his other challenges Mr Denham needs to use his new position to ensure the most in need neighbourhoods benefit the most from such schemes, and that the jobs are genuinely sustainable in the longterm. If not, there is a danger that the chance of a stronger link between the skills agenda and the placemaking and regeneration sector will be lost.

Written by Russell Spencer, Renaisi Consultant

At what cost an expense claim?

Was it the capital gains?  Was it further retaliation to Brown after the ‘youtube if you want to’ comment?  Was it ‘family issues’?

Whatever the real reason for her resignation, the fallout from Hazel Blears’ resignation from government is going to take a few days (and perhaps weeks) to become clear.  There are stories swirling around planet Westminster that this is going to be the final straw for Gordon Brown and that his government won’t be able to take it.  That back benchers are plotting a quick replacement (in the shape of Alan Johnson?) to give the new leader three weeks to get settled in before recess.

Whatever happens, once thing is for sure: there is going to be another few days of news that is not about issues, but about the MPs themselves. First we had day after day of expenses, and now we have senior members of the Labour party tearing themselves to shreds in public.

But Hazel going leaves some questions about the policies that were very much hers.  What happens to the empowerment agenda?  What happens to community ownership of assets?  What happens to all the things that have been driving the community side of regeneration?

Whatever your political views of Hazel Blears, she was a strong voice and campaigner for change on these fronts.  With her gone, will the next minister at CLG take on the baton with the same determination? Or will it be all change, just as it felt like the battle was starting to be won in terms of devolving power closer to communities.

In terms of communities up and down the country, the cost of an expense claim might be much greater than we first thought.

Written by, John Hitchin, Research & Evaluation Manager, EC1 New Deal for Communities

Blaring resignation

Hazel Blears has not tiptoed around very long… she was on her way out but decided to make the first move (or the second after Jacqui Smith’s) in resigning. She could not obviously have done this in a more cacophonic and damaging manner: just after Ms Smith’s resignation, a couple of hours before Prime Minister Questions, the day before European elections. Her departure has intensified dissensions and backstabbed a weakened Gordon Brown on the eve of a national election.

The champion of community cohesion leaves behind her a load of neighbourhood regeneration and empowerment initiatives. But she also leaves a great deal of uncertainty about the future of regeneration and communities. We know that times are challenging and that the actors of sustainable communities have to think about new ways of doing things, whatever the results of the next elections will be. But an abrupt call for election is more likely to jeopardize the promises and slow down the discussions on current important matters: eco towns, accelerated development zones, regional planning reforms, etc.

Blears surely did not resign in the correct manner, and she is obviously worsening the mess. However, it is the time for the government to appoint a new expert team, able to take up the challenges and complexities faced in the regeneration agenda. It could also be the opportunity for the Labour party to start thinking about the dangers of division and working on the vision it wants to spread and share.

Written by Claire Cunin, Renaisi Graduate Consultant

These are the views of these Renaisi Consultants and not of the company as a whole.

Whatever happened to Neighbourhood Renewal?

New Deal for Communities programmes and Neighbourhood Management Pathfinders are preparing to wind down, the NRU is no more than fleeting memory, the National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal gathers dust on shelves in many a town hall, the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund has been replaced by Working Neighbourhoods Fund and Neighbourhood Renewal Advisors have turned into Local Improvement Advisors. So just what has happened to Neighbourhood Renewal and do we care anymore about neighbourhood approaches?

Well there’s no doubt that neighbourhoods still matter and neighbourhoods that have problems matter more than most. Although evaluation after evaluation demonstrates that the neighbourhoods that received all this attention have generally improved for the better there remain, especially in London, too many neighbourhoods were poverty and inequality persist, usually side by side, with great wealth and prosperity. Indeed London has become, over the last ten years, the most unequal capital in Europe despite the huge injection of public funds and the remarkable scale of development from Kings Cross to Stratford and from Cricklewood to the South Bank.

London’s growth as a world city, supported by the current and previous Mayor, and enshrined in the London Plan, was meant to result in a greater share of the benefits of growth for the poorer parts of London. It’s true that previously run down ex industrial areas and disused rail lands and canal basins have been transformed with new gleaming structures. It’s also true that these developments have delivered some benefits for local people in the form of social housing and jobs. However there’s still the feeling that this hasn’t been enough and despite  this splurge of growth and redevelopment, and the radical reformation of the social and economic structure of the capital over the past thirty years – the ‘poor are still with us’ and many of the poorer parts of the capital remain ‘too risky’ for mainstream private sector investors and developers.

To make matters worse the world recession and property slump has turned off the private capital. Mr Brown’s fiscal stimulus has delivered some respite, with the HCA racing to the rescue of some key schemes but many have been halted or mothballed. Certainly the public sector is braving itself for some punishing settlements over the next few years as whoever is in government attempts to re-balance the books.  So all-in-all not a very promising outlook especially if you happen to live in one of the many struggling neighbourhoods in inner and outer London. So is there any point in thinking about neighbourhood renewal? And if there is what is there to do?

Here at Renaisi we firmly believe there is. In fact there is now an even greater need to focus on issues at the neighbourhood level whether they be managing the impacts of rapid changes in the demographic composition of neighbourhoods; dealing with the effects of more entrenched worklessness; helping local enterprises survive; or ensuring that where development does occur it does so in a way that is environmentally sustainable and creates and sustains value for the community as well as the developer.

What we’ve learnt is that local problems are best resolved at the local level and by local people. That’s the only way that you get a solution that’s truly sustainable. This doesn’t mean that there aren’t greater social and economic influences at borough and city level that don’t have an impact or need to be properly understood, before deciding what to do at neighbourhood level. Indeed that is the key to developing solutions that are right. That’s why the most successful areas have thought long and hard about their ‘place shaping’ responsibilities and have begun to think for themselves about how they can renew their neighbourhoods without a national blueprint being handed down to them.

They’ve also developed ways of understanding their local economy, how it’s influenced by London’s wider labour, housing and property markets and what interventions they can make to protect and enhance local enterprise and employment. Within this they’ve carefully considered how major physical regeneration schemes can contribute more locally through innovative partnerships and funding mechanisms. They’ve also made the effort to try and understand the impact of social restructuring on local neighbourhoods and maintained efforts to better deliver and manage public services at a neighbourhood level.

The current recession will challenge all of this considerably especially in those areas where physical renewal is heavily dependent on private sector cash. However even in these dark times there are signs of life and a number of opportunities to protect what you’ve got and prepare for the upturn:

Firstly, we should all still care about neighbourhood renewal and redouble our efforts to deliver it in places where it is needed most. The emphasis of the new Comprehensive Area Assessment will be a sharp reminder to many of the need to tackle inequality. However a new narrative is needed and that should be a localist one and that needs local government to end its ‘parent child’ relationship with central government and start to think for itself once more.  The government, and its likely successor, appear to be willing to return increasing amounts of responsibility to local councils (unfortunately not enough real power) and some new tools such as Tax Increment Financing seem about to finally make an appearance. More councils should respond by taking up the challenge and making the best of what is on the table.

Secondly, understanding London’s economy and how local neighbourhoods and town centres relate to its shifting social and economic sands and the opportunities and challenges this brings and having the ability to plan effectively, at the right spatial scale, to maximise and mitigate these has never been more important.

Thirdly, being prepared to use the assets and financial resources available in bold and innovative ways. This includes new approaches to financing neighbourhood regeneration, including transferring assets to the community sector and building mechanisms that capture value for the long term benefit of local people. Many councils are already buying up land, at the bottom of the property value curve, in readiness for the upturn.

Fourthly, the days of large scale public spending are over for some time. Public sector intervention will still be necessary to deliver regeneration and renewal where it’s needed most. However it is likely to be even more targeted, be raised closer to where it’s needed, rather than delivered from on high by the Treasury or CLG, and involve new and (many not so new!) forms of public private partnerships.

Finally, this means councils having the ability to engage meaningfully with the private sector as the people charged with leading the remaking of London’s neighbourhoods. This requires an approach to plan making that not only reflects the needs and aspirations of local communities but is long term, built on a sound understanding of the local economy, provides a framework for the long term private sector investment and community benefit so sorely missing from many schemes. A new breed of person is needed in some of the regeneration and planning departments and council chambers across London, to make this happen as understanding risk and getting the right deal will never be more important.

Old style Neighbourhood Renewal is dead along with a ‘top down’ approach from government. But a new localist agenda and approach to Neighbourhood Renewal is beginning to emerge from the mist, with local government pulling the approach forward, rather than being pushed by Whitehall.  However, that said, the regeneration tool box is likely to remain frustratingly empty until a whole scale review of the structure of public finance, which is unlikely. The endemic political and investor shortermism may also never be overcome. So things do look rather bleak just now and just like the recession it remains unclear as to how things will pan out. However for those who believe in true neighbourhood renewal, and are committed to tacking the problems in our poorest neighbourhoods, now is the time to take action.  We need to be ambitious, grit our teeth and brave the challenges ahead.

For more information on Renaisi and our approach to Neighbourhood Renewal please conact Rob Pearce, Director of Strategy and Communication on r.pearce@renaisi.com

Financing Regeneration – A comparison with France

Faced with the challenges of narrowing gaps between deprived areas and the rest of the country and the huge financial resources needed to undertake urban regeneration projects, finding innovative tools for financing regeneration projects has always been a concern for governments.

The US-style funding mechanism called Tax Increment Financing (TIF) that is being examined by Whitehall may be an appropriate tool: it allows local and regional authorities to fund infrastructure projects by borrowing against the future tax revenues that the public works project is expected to create.

A TIF does indeed offer a wide range of advantages for the partners involved, local authorities, private investors and property owners. It is however being criticized for its limits in attracting investment in the poorest and most in needs areas and for the risk of pricing out residents due to the rise in prices and property taxes that it involves.

A similar funding system exists in France to remedy the absence of private initiative investment. Public investors such as the Caisse des Depots et des Consignations (public bank), or Industrial and Commercial Public Establishments develop financial packages to implement infrastructure projects, resulting in a significant amount of financial leverage and launching private investment in most deprived areas.

Such money is likely to be spent on infrastructure investments that are most likely to encourage greater private sector investment, and focuses in France on shopping center reconstruction, damaged co-ownership buildings, and hospitals settlements.

In France, this system has been integrated in a wider funding policy since 2002.

Faced with the complexity and the fragmentation of funding tools, and with the limitations apparent in the programmes implemented over the past 20 years, the French government has been led to implement a new co-financing process forming a one-stop funding centre. The Agence Nationale de Rénovation Urbaine (ANRU) – comparable in a way to the new Homes and Communities Agency – has been created to process files and allocate subsidies; it follows two main principles: fungibility and coordinated delivery. Fungiblity means that the subsidies coming from various sources (state, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignation, private sector and social partners) are used freely, without any relation to where they come from. Coordinated delivery implies that those credits are consistently invested in local projects.

This pooling of credits represents a simplified framework for regeneration projects, and a better joining up of regeneration and economic activity. But above all, it seeks to involve the local actors of urban regeneration. The funds are indeed allocated following a strategic application process, during which the need of the project and the backing-up of the local authority are evaluated, with one of the most important requirements being the political momentum by elected members. There may be disadvantages, but the new agency has the benefits of securing the local anchorage of a project and the involvement of local partners, and this could represent an example of best practice the HCA could look at.

Written by Claire Cunin, Renaisi Graduate Consultant

Budget 2009 – First Impressions

At first glance the Budget, with the snappy regeneration-related title of ‘Building Britain’s Future’, seems to offer a lot of positives for the regeneration sector, with the Chancellor committing more money to jobs, green growth and housing. But all this is balanced by a greater demand for efficiency savings from local authorities and lower spending growth and, in the longer term, record levels of borrowing.

First the good news: £600million will be allocated to stimulate housing investment and to kick-start stalled housing developments or dormant sites with planning permission. £100million of this will be used to allow local authorities to ensure higher energy efficiency standards in social housing developments.

The Budget also saw the confirmation of Leeds and Manchester as pilot city-regions, which will give them greater powers to integrate planning, housing, transport, regeneration, employment and skills programmes and increasing their ability to drive sustainable growth and economic development.

Perhaps the most daring move is the £1.2billion that has been given to the Young Persons Guarantee Scheme, which aims to help alleviate the danger that the recession will lead to long-term unemployment by guaranteeing a job, training or work placement for all 18-24 year olds who are unemployed for 12 months. This is a staggering and unprecedented move which will see funding made available for local authorities and voluntary organisations to employ 100,000 young people in ‘socially useful activity’ with 50,000 more jobs on offer in areas of dense unemployment; 10% of these jobs are in the ‘green’ sector. More concrete details about this are eagerly awaited.

Meanwhile a further £260million will be made available for education and training including the expansion of the number of places at sixth-forms and colleges by 54,000 starting in September.

Also of interest is a £750 million Strategic Investment Fund to support advanced industrial projects of strategic importance, £250million of which is earmarked specifically for low carbon projects, helping to create sustainable jobs for the future.

The bad news is that, whilst the Chancellor believes that the economy will recover and begin growth at the end of this year and will grow by 3.5% by 2011, the IMF are more pessimistic, predicting that the UK economy will shrink by 4.1% this year and 0.4% in 2010.

Increased public borrowing, at a record level, combined with less growth in public sector spending and demands for increased cost-saving and efficiency will place further pressure on public sector finances. And whilst the investment to get the housing market moving again are welcome, they represent a drop in the ocean compared to the bail-out of the banks.

The problem, as ever, will be to ensure these initiatives meet the needs of people and places at the neighbourhood level. Renaisi is all about the neighbourhood but the danger is that the initiatives announced in the Budget will not benefit the neighbourhoods and the people that need it most. Take the measures to boost housing development for instance – care will need to be taken to ensure the funding does not simply allow private-sector house-builders to profit at the expense of creating affordable housing for local people. Similarly the Strategic Investment Fund for industry must be careful to ensure local people are connected to the jobs being created and have the opportunity to fully benefit from the investment.

Written by Russell Spencer, Renaisi Consultant