Tag Archives: neighbourhoods

A cautious welcome for the Work Programme

The government’s Work Programme is now underway and we are welcoming clients through the doors of our east and west London offices. We’re proud to be delivery partners for three prime contractors: MAXIMUS and Ingeus Deloitte in West London and Careers Development Group (CDG) in East London.

Replacing a proliferation of welfare to work initiatives which preceded it, this single programme approach is designed to give people greater freedom when accessing services to help them into employment. This is a concept endorsed by Renaisi which has many years experience delivering tailor-made solutions for people wanting to improve their work prospects, but we accept the new approach with caution.

The Work Programme is perceived by many as a cost-cutting approach to dealing with worklessness.  Getting people into meaningful work is certainly not something that can be done on the cheap or by cutting corners.  There’s a broad range of issues that need to be addressed including employer engagement and specialist support for those seeking work, links with local neighbourhoods and community groups and the relationship with local authorities, local enterprise partnerships and training providers.  With limited resources to address these issues, providers might be forced to work with the ‘easy to reach’.

There’s also the fact that the main contracts are now in the hands of large organisations, some of whom have greater expertise in logistics than employment, although we seem to have predominantly avoided those in London. Meanwhile, the smaller and arguably more knowledgeable third sector organisations will suffer the effect of payment by results as cash flow becomes tight. This seems to contradict the spirit of the government’s Localism Bill of devolving to a local level.

Additionally, the  Work Programme is mandatory  and  there is nothing to replace the wider initiatives aimed at supporting self referrals or outreach for those who are economically inactive but not eligible for the scheme so it seems we’re left with a gaping hole in employment provision.

With these concerns in mind, we enter this new approach with guarded enthusiasm as we can see there will be some positive outcomes – the simplicity of the model can only be a good thing for the out-of-work citizen. We propose however that evaluation should start early and focus on the critical issues which, if missed, could have significant repercussions.

 

Fostering Community Cohesion in Diverse Neighbourhoods

NANM Logo

On June 22, the NANM London Learning Event was held at the Royal Institute of British Architects.  The event was attended by a professionally diverse audience of neighbourhood managers, community group leaders, NDC boards, and private sector regenerators. The event was kicked off by keynote speaker, Ted Cantle, Chair for the Institute for Community Cohesion. He was followed by, Local Improvement Advisor, Jo Broadwood, discussing the new community cohesion impact assessment she wrote for Department for Communities and Local Government.  The two morning speakers were joined by the workshop presenters on an interactive panel that connected the policy to practice.

In the afternoon, participants attended two sessions from three of the workshops held. The workshops included Renaisi’s Adam Barnett discussing how planning system can be used to improve cohesion, Fiona Berry, Neighbourhood Manager from Lewisham discussing the challenges faced in a diverse London borough and providing best practice examples from Lewisham.  EC1 NDC’s Kirby Swales and Kate Arnold presented on the communication and engagement tools that have been used in the NDC area to promote a sense of belonging and community cohesion.

Morning presentations summary

Keynote speaker Ted Cantle, Chair of Institute of Community Cohesion

Ted Cantle spoke about how national and local challenges facing cohesion, specifically:

- how national issues are manifested locally

- the challenges of plural identities to cohesion

- building social capital

- notions of citizenship and

- how to better engage at the local level.

He concluded furthering cohesion required building capacity and partnerships, developing an effective communication strategy, and promoting community leadership, improving the role of the voluntary sector.

Ted Cantle’s full presentation can be found here.

Jo Broadwood, Local Improvement Advisor, author Community Cohesion Impact Assessment and Community Conflict Prevention Tool.

Jo Broadwood discussed the steps to conducting a community cohesion impact assessment.  A community cohesion impact assessment test if the project/ activity planned will have a positive or negative impact on community cohesion and community conflict in an area.  Additionally, the assessment helps to clarify the aims and purpose of the project, engage project stakeholders and participants in development, and gather baseline information, so that the project can evidence that it has made a positive difference on the community.

Jo Broadwood’s full presentation can be found here.

Workshop Summaries

Workshop A:

Fiona Berry led workshop 3 discussing the challenges and successful strategies used in Lewisham.  Her workshop provided examples of how to actively engage local people in decision making and influencing services and what issues local people in Lewisham found most pressing.  She also discussed how to manage the allocation of limited resources and effectively communicate to residents why a particular course of action has been chosen.

Fiona Berry’s Presentation is available here.

Workshop B:

Renaisi’s  Adam Barnett presented on how to address cohesion through the planning system. The workshop discussed how the ‘new’ flexible planning system and comprehensive area agreements provide an opportunity to improve cohesion through spatial planning. Adam provided guidance on how to gather information and gain a thorough understanding of the social dynamics of a community.  He also discussed how to move beyond the bricks and mortar to improve cohesion through service delivery.

Adam Barnett’s workshop presentation can be found here.

Workshop C:

EC1 NDC presented a workshop on successful methods for fostering cohesion in their local area.  Their work included campaigning behind common interest, awareness raising monitoring population shifts and impacts, and improving joint working of community facilities. They also provided examples of the specific projects that promoted cohesion including:

- The EC1 magazine. The magazine has been very successful in communicating to residents and there are plans to continue publication after the close of funding for the NDC programme.  The magazine’s success is due in part because it provides a forum for local news and is not simply a marketing tool.  It covers local stories outside of the NDC, profiles local people and has wide distribution to every household in the NDC area.

- EC1 Summer Festival, an annual event, attracts a wide and diverse audience.  The festival encourages participation through recruiting local volunteers and booking local entertainment.

- EC1 Pride Awards, an awards programme, where local people nominate their local heroes.  The ceremony recognises the good work of residents and generates a sense of pride.

- Youth Film Project, KCP Youth and EC1 NDC used a film making project to generate discussion about generational cohesion issues.  The film gave residents a chance to dispel myths about young people and cross generational boundaries.

The EC1 NDC workshop presentation can be found here.

Participant Quotes:

“The ability to directly gain from Lewisham’s experience and share Best Practice

in Swale”-Kelly Walker, Swale Borough Council, Community Cohesion Worker

The Practical Workshop of Community Cohesion at the neighbourhood level provided good ideas to use in Dudley- Judith Ashford, Area Community Renewal Officer, Dudley MBC

“I enjoyed the workshops at they were small and interactive” – Dawn Miller, Aston Pride, Community Representative

“The theme of relating community cohesion policy to practice was most useful”-Dawn Osborne, Sunderland City Council, Policy Officer

Whatever happened to Neighbourhood Renewal?

New Deal for Communities programmes and Neighbourhood Management Pathfinders are preparing to wind down, the NRU is no more than fleeting memory, the National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal gathers dust on shelves in many a town hall, the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund has been replaced by Working Neighbourhoods Fund and Neighbourhood Renewal Advisors have turned into Local Improvement Advisors. So just what has happened to Neighbourhood Renewal and do we care anymore about neighbourhood approaches?

Well there’s no doubt that neighbourhoods still matter and neighbourhoods that have problems matter more than most. Although evaluation after evaluation demonstrates that the neighbourhoods that received all this attention have generally improved for the better there remain, especially in London, too many neighbourhoods were poverty and inequality persist, usually side by side, with great wealth and prosperity. Indeed London has become, over the last ten years, the most unequal capital in Europe despite the huge injection of public funds and the remarkable scale of development from Kings Cross to Stratford and from Cricklewood to the South Bank.

London’s growth as a world city, supported by the current and previous Mayor, and enshrined in the London Plan, was meant to result in a greater share of the benefits of growth for the poorer parts of London. It’s true that previously run down ex industrial areas and disused rail lands and canal basins have been transformed with new gleaming structures. It’s also true that these developments have delivered some benefits for local people in the form of social housing and jobs. However there’s still the feeling that this hasn’t been enough and despite  this splurge of growth and redevelopment, and the radical reformation of the social and economic structure of the capital over the past thirty years – the ‘poor are still with us’ and many of the poorer parts of the capital remain ‘too risky’ for mainstream private sector investors and developers.

To make matters worse the world recession and property slump has turned off the private capital. Mr Brown’s fiscal stimulus has delivered some respite, with the HCA racing to the rescue of some key schemes but many have been halted or mothballed. Certainly the public sector is braving itself for some punishing settlements over the next few years as whoever is in government attempts to re-balance the books.  So all-in-all not a very promising outlook especially if you happen to live in one of the many struggling neighbourhoods in inner and outer London. So is there any point in thinking about neighbourhood renewal? And if there is what is there to do?

Here at Renaisi we firmly believe there is. In fact there is now an even greater need to focus on issues at the neighbourhood level whether they be managing the impacts of rapid changes in the demographic composition of neighbourhoods; dealing with the effects of more entrenched worklessness; helping local enterprises survive; or ensuring that where development does occur it does so in a way that is environmentally sustainable and creates and sustains value for the community as well as the developer.

What we’ve learnt is that local problems are best resolved at the local level and by local people. That’s the only way that you get a solution that’s truly sustainable. This doesn’t mean that there aren’t greater social and economic influences at borough and city level that don’t have an impact or need to be properly understood, before deciding what to do at neighbourhood level. Indeed that is the key to developing solutions that are right. That’s why the most successful areas have thought long and hard about their ‘place shaping’ responsibilities and have begun to think for themselves about how they can renew their neighbourhoods without a national blueprint being handed down to them.

They’ve also developed ways of understanding their local economy, how it’s influenced by London’s wider labour, housing and property markets and what interventions they can make to protect and enhance local enterprise and employment. Within this they’ve carefully considered how major physical regeneration schemes can contribute more locally through innovative partnerships and funding mechanisms. They’ve also made the effort to try and understand the impact of social restructuring on local neighbourhoods and maintained efforts to better deliver and manage public services at a neighbourhood level.

The current recession will challenge all of this considerably especially in those areas where physical renewal is heavily dependent on private sector cash. However even in these dark times there are signs of life and a number of opportunities to protect what you’ve got and prepare for the upturn:

Firstly, we should all still care about neighbourhood renewal and redouble our efforts to deliver it in places where it is needed most. The emphasis of the new Comprehensive Area Assessment will be a sharp reminder to many of the need to tackle inequality. However a new narrative is needed and that should be a localist one and that needs local government to end its ‘parent child’ relationship with central government and start to think for itself once more.  The government, and its likely successor, appear to be willing to return increasing amounts of responsibility to local councils (unfortunately not enough real power) and some new tools such as Tax Increment Financing seem about to finally make an appearance. More councils should respond by taking up the challenge and making the best of what is on the table.

Secondly, understanding London’s economy and how local neighbourhoods and town centres relate to its shifting social and economic sands and the opportunities and challenges this brings and having the ability to plan effectively, at the right spatial scale, to maximise and mitigate these has never been more important.

Thirdly, being prepared to use the assets and financial resources available in bold and innovative ways. This includes new approaches to financing neighbourhood regeneration, including transferring assets to the community sector and building mechanisms that capture value for the long term benefit of local people. Many councils are already buying up land, at the bottom of the property value curve, in readiness for the upturn.

Fourthly, the days of large scale public spending are over for some time. Public sector intervention will still be necessary to deliver regeneration and renewal where it’s needed most. However it is likely to be even more targeted, be raised closer to where it’s needed, rather than delivered from on high by the Treasury or CLG, and involve new and (many not so new!) forms of public private partnerships.

Finally, this means councils having the ability to engage meaningfully with the private sector as the people charged with leading the remaking of London’s neighbourhoods. This requires an approach to plan making that not only reflects the needs and aspirations of local communities but is long term, built on a sound understanding of the local economy, provides a framework for the long term private sector investment and community benefit so sorely missing from many schemes. A new breed of person is needed in some of the regeneration and planning departments and council chambers across London, to make this happen as understanding risk and getting the right deal will never be more important.

Old style Neighbourhood Renewal is dead along with a ‘top down’ approach from government. But a new localist agenda and approach to Neighbourhood Renewal is beginning to emerge from the mist, with local government pulling the approach forward, rather than being pushed by Whitehall.  However, that said, the regeneration tool box is likely to remain frustratingly empty until a whole scale review of the structure of public finance, which is unlikely. The endemic political and investor shortermism may also never be overcome. So things do look rather bleak just now and just like the recession it remains unclear as to how things will pan out. However for those who believe in true neighbourhood renewal, and are committed to tacking the problems in our poorest neighbourhoods, now is the time to take action.  We need to be ambitious, grit our teeth and brave the challenges ahead.

For more information on Renaisi and our approach to Neighbourhood Renewal please conact Rob Pearce, Director of Strategy and Communication on r.pearce@renaisi.com